Flole Systems wrote:
> It's not beautiful and definitely not the best job ever done as the code is not thread-safe. That's why it's not included yet. If a proper fix is provided it can be reviewed and then possibly be merged.
Аre there any specific guidelines, or is this a general impression,
what exactly needs to change?
Exact direction.
The purpose of the exercise is to improve the product,
not to refuse developers to offer code due to unclear explanations.
I do not believe that anyone will mind if a corrective code of proposals is proposed.
Тeam work.